Legal Opinion

People v. Mazur

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2015No. Docket 149290PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.

This case requires us to examine immunity under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq. We are specifically concerned with the application of the MMMA’s immunity provisions to individuals who are neither registered qualifying patients nor primary caregivers. See MCL 333.26424(g); MCL 333.26424(i).

We hold that a defendant claiming that he or she is solely in the presence or vicinity of the medical use of marijuana is not entitled to immunity under MCL 333.26424(f) when the medical use of marijuana was not in accordance with the act. Nor is a defendant entitled to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Miller-Davis Co. v. Ahrens Construction, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Robert TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. S. Dearborn Envtl. Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. QualityMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. FeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Roselyn Ford v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People of Michigan v. Keith Eric WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API