Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Fleming
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, Presiding Justice.
The corporation first referred to in the -headnotes is Southern States Phosphate and Fertilizer Company. The second is Pope & Fleming Incorporated. There is no controversy as to the second check for regular periodic dividend *117re'eeived from each. Defendants contend that the first check also from each corporation should have been credited to income, instead of to corpus as was done by the executors and trustees. The check in controversy from the fertilizer company was for $48,675. The one from Pope & Fleming Inc. was $45,000. Total of the two, $93,675. Doubt having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Sumpter v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Cook v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Millen v. GuerrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Adair v. St. AmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armstrong v. MertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Kidd v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Bratton v. Trust Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Wright v. Florida-Georgia Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Reynolds v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941