Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Merts

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1947No. 15828PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) There is no merit in the contention that the court was without authority in passing upon the demurrers to construe the will of the testator. These demurrers challenged the correctness of the construction which the plaintiff alleged should be given to the will. The petition raises only legal questions concerning the' will, and such issues should be settled by demurrer. Code, § 81-303. In Gilmore v. Gilmore, 197 Ga. 303 (29 S. E. 2d, 74), which was a case involving the construction of a will where the issues were made by petition and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sumpter v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Cook v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Comer v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Trustees of the University of Georgia v. DenmarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Glore v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. McDonald v. SuarezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Lewis v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Schriber v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Budreau v. MingledorffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API