Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Prospect Waterproofing Company

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 21, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0077PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this proposed class action, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, against defendants Prospect Waterproofing Company and its owner, George Barlow, for unpaid wages based on state statutory and common law claims. Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, arguing that plaintiffs’ claims are founded on the Davis-Bacon Act (the “Act” or “DBA”), 40 U.S.C. § 3141, et seq., which does not give rise to a private right of action but instead establishes an administrative process for the recovery of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Alvarez-Soto v. B. Frank Joy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
  3. Alumni Cruises, LLC v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  4. Garcia v. Skanska USA Bldg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Lewis v. Gaylor, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API