Legal Opinion

Modrell v. Crews

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 26, 1937No. 13,919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bouck

The judgment before us for review purports to establish a perpetual right of way over certain land for ingress to and egress from a reservoir in Yuma county, but it assumes to do more. To some extent the judgment is entitled to be approved, but proper limitations must be set and the judgment itself accordingly modified.

The action is an injunction suit, brought to restrain the defendants from interfering with the right of way in question.

Crews, as plaintiff, sued both Modrell, the owner of the land which Crews asked to have made subservient to an easement, and Modrell’s lessee and mortgagee,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barrios v. Pleasant Valley & Lake Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Blanchard v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Ronce v. FavreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. Montgomery v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  5. Young v. CoreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API