Legal Opinion

Young v. Corey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 22, 1937No. 14,170Published

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as there.

Plaintiffs alleged that defendant had interfered with their irrigation rights and prayed injunction and damages. Defendant admitted plaintiffs’ title but otherwise denied. He furthermore pleaded his own interests and rights, alleged that plaintiffs had interfered therewith, • demurred generally to the complaint, and prayed injunction and damages. Plaintiffs replied, alleging, inter alia, a district court decree which foreclosed certain of defendant’s claims. Defendant moved to strike, as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Modrell v. CrewsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Schattinger v. SchattingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API