Legal Opinion
A. B. C. Needlecraft Co., Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., and Sigmund Heftman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 21, 1957No. 24324_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Circuit Judge.
This action, brought against Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., and Sigmund Heft-man for their alleged libel of the plaintiff corporation, was removed to the district court by reason of diverse citizenship. There Heftman was dismissed as a party defendant, and, after a jury trial, judgment was rendered against Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., for compensatory and punitive damages. Appealing from that judgment Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., asserts that the evidence was insufficient to take the case to the jury. 1 Alternatively-, it asks that the case be remanded for a .new trial because of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Pecue v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Grant v. Reader's Digest Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Ormsby v. . DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dun and Bradstreet, Inc. v. O'NEILTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Berner v. British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Shore v. Retailers Commercial Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.