Legal Opinion

Ormsby v. . Douglass

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1868PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

While the law authorizes actions of slander to be maintained, to vindicate the reputation and character of individuals who have been wrongfully and unjustly assailed, it also upholds the principle that, in a certain class of cases, communications between individuals are regarded as privileged; and are, therefore, protected from the presumption of malice which is usually to be inferred from the charge itself. Where the wrongful act is intentional, a malicious intent is implied, and the party is held responsible. But, in actions of slander, if it be made to appear that the defendant had just…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Den v. HuffTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Van Wyck v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Howard v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Washburn v. CookeNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Shore v. Retailers Commercial Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Fahr v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  3. King v. PattersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  4. Mitchell v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Sunderlin v. . BradstreetNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API