Legal Opinion

Stoeckinger v. Presidential Financial Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 2008No. 2327 WDA 2006PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Peter E. Stoeckinger appeals from the order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Presidential Financial Corporation of Delaware Valley in Stoeckinger’s action against Presidential for unjust enrichment and tortious interference with contract. Stoeckinger argues that the trial court erred in determining that his claims were barred by res judica-ta due to a prior bankruptcy proceeding involving the parties herein. For the following reasons, we affirm.

¶ 2 The material facts are not disputed. This case arises from the nonpayment of loans that each party…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Young v. Commonwealth Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. AmeriPro Search, Inc. v. Fleming Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. McNeil v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Joyce v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Discover Bank v. StuckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API