Legal Opinion
Landon, Inc. v. Marine Swimming Pool Equipment Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 3, 1961No. 480-60-YPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The above entitled cause heretofore tried, argued and submitted is now decided as follows:
Upon the grounds stated in the Comment to follow the Court finds that the claims of Letters Patent No, 2,826,307, *42issued to R. M. Pace on March 11, 1958, especially Claim 2 thereof, and the claims of Letters Patent No. 2,844,255, issued to D. K. Cavenah, et ah, on July 22, 1958, especially Claim 4 thereof, are and each of them is valid and infringed by the defendant’s devices.
Judgment will be for the plaintiff as prayed for in the Complaint. Single damages to be ascertained upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Brinkerhoff v. AloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Himes v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Great Lakes Equipment Company v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Manufacturing Co. v. Landon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Comptone Co. v. Opti-Ray, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
- International Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Rodolfo Jacuzzi, an Individual v. Landon, Inc., a Corporation, Jacuzzi Bros., a Corporation v. Landon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964