Romanoff v. Desanto
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
The defendant appeals from the action of the trial court in refusing to make certain corrections in its finding of facts, and also from certain alleged errors in the court’s conclusion of law upon the facts found. A careful examination of the evidence printed, together with the exhibits made part of the finding, discloses the fact that none of the findings of the court were made without evidence, and that none of the corrections contradictory of the court’s findings are established by undisputed evidence. Some of the corrected findings suggested by defendant are constructions of the exhibits…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Strakosch v. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Caulfield v. HermannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Averill v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCleave v. John J. Flanagan Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Vachon v. TomascakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Lombardi v. LaudatiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Federal Finance Co. v. Forman Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Lewitt v. Park Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.