Caulfield v. Hermann
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover rent for'the use of an organ alleged tó have been hired by the defendant; brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County and tried to the court, Calhoun, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff and appeal by the defendant for an alleged error of the court in excluding evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtFenn, J.
On February 18th, 1892, the plaintiff delivered an organ to the defendant, on trial, for the use of the defendant’s child. On March 1st, 1892, the plaintiff and defendant made and executed a written agreement respecting said organ, of lease and conditional sale, upon which agreer ment the present suit was brought. The agreement stated that the value of the instrument was $120; that it was leased for eleven months, for ten dollars in advance and ten dollars per month thereafter, and that when the said sum of $120 was paid as provided, with interest, it should be sold and delivered with an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McFarland v. SikesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Collins v. TillouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brosty v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Strakosch v. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- New Idea Pattern Co. v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Asbestos Products Corporation v. MatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Byars v. ByarsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.