Legal Opinion

Henshall v. Coburn

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1917No. S. F. No. 7555PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendants Loren Coburn and Sarah Satira Coburn, his wife, appeal from a judgment against them, from a modified judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff, an attorney and counselor at law, sued for $19,-450, alleged to be due for the value of professional services performed by him for defendants jointly. After issue joined the case was tried before a jury and a verdict for $10,450 was returned. Defendants moved for a new trial and the court made a conditional order that if within twenty days plaintiff should consent to remit all over five thousand dollars, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Koeber v. SomersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Wilkins v. StidgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Gill Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Banks (In Re Banks)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998
  3. Perkins v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Roberts v. Permanente Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Estate of StraisingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API