Legal Opinion
United States v. Renzi
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 4, 2010No. CR08-212 TUC DCB BPVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
This matter having been referred to Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco, he issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) on March 11, 2010. (Doc. 594.) The Magistrate Judge recommended denying in part and granting in part Defendant Renzi’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on the Government’s Unlawful Recording of Privileged Counsel Calls. (Doc. 87.) Defendant Renzi argued that the wiretap violated Title III, 28 U.S.C. § 2518, and the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Magistrate Judge found violations of Title III…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette McneillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- United States v. GofferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. ArevaloDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015