Jensen v. Fhima
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
On appeal from an order denying a motion to stay docketing and enforcement of a foreign judgment that had been renewed two times in the original forum, appellant argues that the district court erred because Minn.Stat. § 548.29 (2006) does not require an affidavit from appellant when the affidavit of his attorney was sufficient, nor does it require that he post security upon filing the motion to stay. Appellant also argues that the district court exceeded the scope of the motion by making findings on the merits when it should have granted the motion to stay to permit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013