Legal Opinion

3105 Grand Corp. v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1942PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This action is in equity to recover moneys diverted from receivership funds beneficially owned by plaintiffs to pay taxes on property in another realty foreclosure receivership of which payments defendant, 92-21 Union Hall Street, Inc., received the benefit. Two separate and independent foreclosure proceedings were pending, one by plaintiffs and another by defendant-appellant. One Boehle was receiver in plaintiffs’ foreclosure, and one Faber was receiver in appellant’s foreclosure. Boehle and Faber were business associates, and appellant was actively engaged in compelling Faber through court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Whiting v. . Hudson Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Newell v. HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . HavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Bonham v. Coe, KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Baratta v. KozlowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. Kieron Mazzola and First Fidelity L.S. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. King v. PelkofskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Fenly v. RevellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Westchester Fire Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API