Legal Opinion

Fenly v. Revell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1951No. 38,180PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendants to recover money he had paid a third party in settlement of damages sustained by the latter as a result of defendants’ negligence while in his employ. The appeal is from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an amended petition, based on grounds such pleading showed on its face the plaintiff was not the real party in interest and failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in his favor and against defendants.

The pleading in question, which does not appear from the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Losito v. Kruse, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gerseta Corporation v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. City of New York Insurance v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. 3105 Grand Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. Publix Cab Co. v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Security Insurance Company of New Haven v. Virgil H. Johnson and Rex Bratcher, D/B/A Johnson-Bratcher Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API