Legal Opinion
Said v. Rouge Steel Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 1995No. Docket 149367PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right the dismissal of his claim against defendant for maintenance and cure. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
On November 4, 1986, plaintiff was injured while employed as a crewman aboard the vessel M/V Henry Ford II, owned and operated by defendant. On January 20, 1987, plaintiff filed suit in federal district court, alleging negligence under the Jones Act, 46 USC 688, and unseaworthiness under general admiralty and maritime law, as well as a claim for maintenance and cure. The case was mediated, and both parties accepted the $500,000 evaluation. On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- McKinney v. Waterman Steamship Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. UllahMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Dubuc v. Green Oak TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Iron County v. Sundberg, Carolson & Associates, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Dubuc v. Green Oak TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Dubuc v. Green Oak TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.