Legal Opinion

Cuttill v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Mahaska District Gourt. — Henry Sil wold, Judge. Action for wages resulted in judgment, in part as prayed. Tbe plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.

Plaintiff alleged, in the first count of his petition, that he entered into an oral contract with the Knoxville Motor Car Company, to render service® as a salesman and machinist, at the salary of $75 per month, and so did from March 18, 1913, until January 18, 1915. In the second count, the allegation was that he rendered such services at the instance and request of said company. W. H. Witt, Harry Lindsley, Walter H. Harrington, and Nate Harrington are alleged to have constituted the co-partnership known as the Knoxville Motor Car Company, and judgment was prayed in the sum of $1,271. Later,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Hancock & Co. v. HintragerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Sheldon v. BigelowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Jenkins v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Wallerich v. E. W. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arbie Mineral Feed Company v. NissenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API