Hancock & Co. v. Hintrager
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Dubuque Circuit Court. This is an action upon an account for goods alleged to have been sold to the defendants as partners. Judgment was demanded against the defendants severally. There was a trial to the court without a jury and judgment was rendered against the defendant Hintrager, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
1. PARTNERship:wiio nerI. The principal point in controversy was the question whether or not Hintrager was liable as a partner of Sumbardo, at the time the goods for which . ° the action was ■ brought were purchased. We think that the evidence fully warranted the court in finding that, whatever were the rights of the respective defendants between themselves, their relation to the plaintiffs was that of partners. It appears in evidence that Hintrager personally ordered some of the goods which were purchased, and that he accompanied the order with a statement that he would be responsible for…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Security Co. v. GraybealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Hartney v. GoslingWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
- Ricker v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Jaffray & Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Berg v. Kucharo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.