Legal Opinion

Southwestern Surety Ins. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1919No. 8741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Histrict Court. Oklahoma County; George W-. Clark, Judge. Action by the Southwestern Surety Insurance Company against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This is an action against a surety on a bond and originated as follows: The Art Wall Paper Mills, a corporation, obtained judgment in the district court of Oklahoma county against J. W. Ripy & Son, a copartnership. From the judgment of the district court Ripy & Son appealed to this court, giving a supersedeas bond signed by the Southwestern Surety Insurance Company, as surety. The judgment of the district court was affirmed by this court, whereupon Ripy & Son applied to the Supreme Cqurt of the United States for a writ of error, and in the meantime obtained a stay of mandate from this court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Locke v. McVeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. First National Bank v. GerkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  3. Lewis v. DwightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  4. McDonald v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. of New York v. SteenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Logan v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Younger v. Blanchard Hdwe. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Oklahoma State Bank v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Boyle v. MontagueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API