Legal Opinion

Mancillas v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 15, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 93-0249PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Plaintiff was one of seven people injured in an automobile accident by a tortfeasor with a statutory minimum liability coverage. Apportionment of the tortfeasor’s liability policy limits among the injured parties resulted in plaintiff recovering less than the minimum amount specified in the Financial Responsibility Law. The issue is whether the tortfeasor is therefore “functionally uninsured” so that plaintiff may recover under the uninsured motorist provisions of his own policy, the difference between the amount available to him from the tortfeasor’s liability policy and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Miller v. Westcor Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. EVENCHIC v. State Farm Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Carden v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Mancillas v. PROPERTY & CAS. INS. FUNDCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API