Legal Opinion

Carden v. Golden Eagle Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 10, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 96-0420PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from summary judgment awarded in favor of defendant-appellee Golden Eagle Insurance Company (Golden Eagle) in a declaratory judgment action filed to determine whether an employer who provides underinsured motorist insurance for its employees under Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 20-259.01(B) must purchase such insurance in equal amounts for all of its employees. The trial court concluded that it did not and that the insurance policy at issue was neither contrary to public policy nor Arizona law. Appellant Anthony Carden (Carden) disagrees.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Higgins v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. TankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herman v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Wetherill v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API