Legal Opinion

Cordill v. City of Estacada

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 1984No. 82-2-160; CA A24996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus. Petitioners seek to compel respondents to revoke a building permit for, and require removal of, a car wash built in violation of zoning ordinances. They also seek to prevent respondents from changing any applicable zoning ordinances. Petitioners appeal from a judgment ordering the City and the City Council to conform the use of the property to the zoning ordinances, seeking a more specific mandate. Respondents cross-appeal, seeking dismissal of the proceeding. We affirm.

Petitioners reside in a home adjacent to property zoned C-2 commercial under the City of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Peterson v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Trippeer v. CouchOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos County Airport DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Seida v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos County Airport DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Travis v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API