Legal Opinion

Petroleo Brasileiro, S.A. v. Nalco Chemical Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-1092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROTMAN, District Judge:

Presently before the court is defendant Nalco Chemical Company’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment dismissing any claim for market loss damages. After considering the submissions of the parties and the arguments of counsel, the court will grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On December 18, 1989, Internor Trade, Inc. (“Internor”) purchased a cargo of approximately 334,000 barrels of high pour, no. 6 fuel oil (“the cargo”) which was to be transported by the vessel M/T Mantinia from Bahia,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. San Clemente Financial Group Securities, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  2. Petroleo Brasileiro, S.A., Petrobras v. Nalco Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Reola Garcia Oliver, James Oliver and Frankie Oliver v. Terminix International Company, LLPSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API