Angel v. United States
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which directed this Court to make the following Findings of Fact. Angel v. United States, 775 F.2d 132 (6th Cir.1985).
1. As a matter of fact, did the decedent know or should he have known that the transformer installation was dangerous. Id. at 138 n. 11.
2. Was harmful contact with the high voltage wire in question unforeseeable, either generally or under the specific circumstances in which decedent was working. Id. at 143.
3.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cafferkey v. Turner Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Cassidy v. GlossipOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Ramona Freeman, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Winningham v. North American ResourcesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992