Legal Opinion
Winningham v. North American Resources
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 29, 1992No. C-1-91-447PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CONCERNING POST-TRIAL MOTIONS AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
The Court held a lengthy jury trial in this case in June 1992. The jury found that all the Defendants had acted negligently. Specifically, the jury determined that the percentage of negligence attributable to North American Resources (“NARC”) was 84%; the percentage of negligence attributable to Mose Cohen & Sons, Inc. (“Mose Cohen”) and/or I. Deutch & Sons, Inc. (“I. Deutch”) doing business as the partnership of Cincinnati Autoshredders (“CAS”) was 16%; and, the Plaintiffs own negligence was 0%.
The jury…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Hill v. Spiegel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winningham v. North American Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Dale M. Winningham v. North American Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994