Legal Opinion

People v. Pettinato

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1986PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the motion to suppress granted and the indictment dismissed.

Because a warrantless intrusion by a government official is presumptively unreasonable, it is the People’s burden in the first instance to establish justification (People v Calhoun, 49 NY2d 398, 402; see, People v Knapp, 52 NY2d 689, 694). Only after it has done so is it defendant’s burden to prove illegality. Here there is nothing in the record, on either defendants case or on the People’s presentation, to support the Hearing Judge’s finding that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. CalhounNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. WylieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. GonzalezNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. DeFrainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. In re Tyheem S.New York City Family Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API