Legal Opinion

Walch v. Crandall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1987No. Docket 87701PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. B. Sullivan, P.J.

Plaintiffs Desmer and Leona Walch initiated the instant action for specific performance in order to obtain the mineral rights in certain real property pursuant to a land contract entered into between themselves, as purchasers, and defendants Henry and June Crandall, as sell ers. The Crandalls counterclaimed for reformation or rescission of the land contract on the basis of mistake. The other named defendants were added as parties to this action because each purportedly possessed an interest in the mineral rights at issue. Plaintiffs now appeal as of right from the September 6, 1985, judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Vergote v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. G & D Co. v. Durand Milling Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cattin v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Energetics, Ltd. v. BenchleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. 14 Employee Benefits Cas. 2769, 17 Ucc rep.serv.2d 583 Gary L. Cattin and Thomas F. Omans (90-1016), Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. General Motors Corporation (90-1051) Electronic Data Systems Corporation (90-1052), Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Sable v. Manufacturers National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API