Legal Opinion

Monarch E & S Insurance Services v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 9, 1999No. CV 98-2013-CAS RZXPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SNYDER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter arises out of the claim by plaintiff Monarch E & S Insurance Services (“Monarch”) and National Casualty Co. (“National”) 1 that Monarch’s commercial general liability (“CGL”) insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. (“State Farm”) had a duty to defend and indemnify Monarch in an underlying misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition action brought against Monarch by Burns & Wilcox Insurance Services, Inc. (“Burns & Wilcox”). The matter is presently before the Court on the parties’ cross…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API