Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Newman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2010No. 2009-1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam..

{¶ 1} Respondent, George W. Newman III of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0050769, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in October 1964. In June 2009, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a complaint charging respondent with violations of Prof.Cond.R. 8.1(b) (prohibiting a lawyer from knowingly failing to respond to a demand for information from a disciplinary authority), 8.3(a) (requiring an attorney to report to disciplinary authority his own violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raise a question about his honesty, trustworthiness, or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. NewmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BlankemeyerOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FuscoOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lindon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API