Legal Opinion

Peppin v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 5, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

We repeat without change many of the statements of fact contained in the former opinion.

“The defendant’s railroad runs parallel with Canal street and with the Amoskeag Mills. The mills are on the west of the railroad and Canal street on the east. To enter the mills it is therefore necessary to cross the tracks.' Thesé tracks are two in number, one for the north bound and one for the south bound trains. Middle street enters Canal street from the east.”

The gates at the Middle street crossing had been installed by the defendant but were operated by the Amoskeag Manufacturing Company by virtue of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  2. Nawn v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. Walker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  5. Olney v. RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howe v. JamesonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. Manseau v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API