Legal Opinion

Williams v. Holley

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided May 26, 1983No. 10-82-160-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

The defendants in the trial court, G.E. Williams and H.J. Sallee, appeal by writ of error a post-answer default judgment rendered on pleadings set forth for the first time in the plaintiff’s first amended original petition filed after defendants had answered the original petition. For reversal, the defendants contend the judgment record does not show notice to them of the amended petition in accordance with the provisions of Rule 72, Vernon’s Tex.Rules Civ.Proc., 1 nor notice to them of the trial setting required by Rule 245. We affirm the judgment.

Rule 72 provides in pertinent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pace Sports, Inc. v. Davis Brothers Pub. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. P. Bosco & Sons Contracting Corp. v. Conley, Lott, Nichols MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Farmer v. CassityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Grapevine Trucking, Inc. v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Industrial Leasing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  2. Jones v. Texas Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Alvarado v. Magic Valley Electric Co-Op, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  4. Lambert v. Coachmen Industries of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Prihoda v. Marek, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API