Legal Opinion

Prihoda v. Marek

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 18, 1990No. 13-89-484-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Appellant contests a post-answer default judgment by writ of error. He maintains that error is shown on the face of the record in that the record does not affirmatively reflect that he had notice of the trial setting.

The four elements necessary for a review by writ of error are: (1) the petition must be brought within six months of the date of judgment (2) by a party to the suit (3) who did not participate in the trial, and (4) error must be apparent from the face of the record. Stubbs v. Stubbs, 685 S.W.2d 643, 644 (Tex.1985). The test has also been stated that a party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. StubbsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wilson v. Industrial Leasing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  3. Pace Sports, Inc. v. Davis Brothers Pub. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Retail Technologies, Inc. v. Palm City T v. Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  5. Williams v. Holley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Villalon v. Bank One, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  2. Langdale v. VillamilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Delgado v. Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Robert S. Wilson Investments No. 16 Ltd. v. Blumer, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  5. Garcia v. Arbor Green Owners Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API