State v. Jones
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendant’s first three assignments of error are based on the search of his car and the introduction into evidence of a shotgun seized during that search. These assignments will be considered together.
Defendant contends the shotgun was inadmissible on grounds it was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment, as one of the original eight substantive amendments forming the Bill of Rights, does not limit any power or prohibit any action of the State of North Carolina, or any of its agents. Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wilkerson v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.