Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 23, 1993No. CR1-0222-34; CA A71298Published

1ConcurrenceDeits, J.

Although I agree with the majority that defendant’s conviction should be affirmed, I disagree with its discussion of the issue of the admissibility of the HGN test evidence at trial. The majority holds that the state must first lay a scientific foundation to present evidence of the HGN test. State u. Reed, 83 Or App 451, 732 P2d 66 (1987). I believe that the enactment of ORS 813.135 and ORS 801.272 eliminates the need to lay such a foundation.

Enacted in 1989, ORS 813.135 is an implied consent statute, which provides:

“Any person who operates a vehicle upon premises open to the public or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TrenaryOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API