State v. Reed
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendant appeals her conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). Former ORS 487.540 (now ORS 813.010). She argues that it was error to admit evidence of the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test and to refuse to give certain jury instructions. We affirm.
In April, 1985, Trooper Roberts stopped defendant, who was speeding and driving erratically. She smelled an odor of alcohol and asked defendant if she had been drinking. She said that she had. After reading her the Miranda rights, Roberts conducted several field sobriety tests, including the HGN test. Based on the results…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. ChiodoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. LeahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BressonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WitteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- State v. GarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Young v. City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.