Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Whitten

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1968No. B-361PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Plaintiff, John David Whitten, recovered a judgment upon a jury verdict against Humble Oil & Refining Company for injuries he sustained in a fall from the top of an oil storage tank. Humble had supplied the tank to Delta Drilling Company, Whitten’s employer. The tank when delivered by Humble to Delta was not equipped either with a ladder or a gauge. The court of civil appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 415 S.W.2d 287. In our opinion, all of the evidence shows that plaintiff’s fall was the result of a new and intervening cause. We reverse the judgment of the courts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hopson v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Phan Son Van v. PenaTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Knoll v. Neblett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Dew v. Crown Derrick Erectors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Omega Contracting, Inc. v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. McAllen Kentucky Fried Chicken No. 1, Inc. v. LealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API