Legal Opinion

Tuller v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of ejectment for a strip of land which is now used as a public street in the city of Detroit, known as “ Piquette avenue,” extending from Hastings street to Bussell street, across lot two, subdivision of fractional sections 29 and 32. Plaintiff became the owner of out-lot two of such subdivision in 1869. In 1884 the city commenced proceedings to open an avenue from Hastings street to Bussell street through this out-lot, leaving a portion of the out-lot on each side of the. new street, thus giving a frontage for lots on both sides of the street.

The condemnation proceedings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. DalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Armstrong v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Cowenhoven v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Brush v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hawkins v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Flynn v. Beaverhead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Sanilac Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API