Tuller v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of ejectment for a strip of land which is now used as a public street in the city of Detroit, known as “ Piquette avenue,” extending from Hastings street to Bussell street, across lot two, subdivision of fractional sections 29 and 32. Plaintiff became the owner of out-lot two of such subdivision in 1869. In 1884 the city commenced proceedings to open an avenue from Hastings street to Bussell street through this out-lot, leaving a portion of the out-lot on each side of the. new street, thus giving a frontage for lots on both sides of the street.
The condemnation proceedings…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Detroit v. DalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Armstrong v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Cowenhoven v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Brush v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hicks v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hawkins v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Flynn v. Beaverhead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Sandusky Grain Co. v. Sanilac Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915