Legal Opinion

Sandusky Grain Co. v. Sanilac Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1915No. Calendar No. 26,490PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus by the Sandusky Grain Company against Watson Beach, judge of the circuit court for the county of Sanilac, to require respondent to issue an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

We are asked to grant an order requiring the court below to grant an order restraining the Detroit, Bay City & Western Railroad Company from taking possession of or performing any work upon, or disturbing the surface of, Argyle avenue, in the city of Sandusky, Mich., in the construction of a spur track, until the further order of the court.

From the pleadings it appears that the interested railroad company is building a line of road from Bay City to Port Huron, through the city of Sandusky, and when the original bill was filed was seeking opportunity to construct a certain spur or side track…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bliss v. Caille Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Michigan Air Line Railway Co. v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Tuller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GauntlettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re Hudson Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Brill v. BrillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Jacox v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API