Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis (fourt of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

The plaintiff sued.the defendant, city of St. Louis, in ejectment, for two parcels of'land lying in said 'city, laying his damages at $15,000 and stating the monthly rents and profits to be $83.93.

*310The answer was a denial, and a plea of the statute of limitations, and also, as a defense, -that plaintiff had dedicated the premises to the city, to be used as a street, and that the city had proceeded, after said dedication, to improve said parcels of land to be used as a street, and that, for ten years next before the commencement of this suit, said premises had, with plaintiff’s consent, been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walther v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  2. Higbee v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Evans v. Missouri, Iowa & Nebraska Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Cowenhoven v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Walker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Freeman v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bradley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Hays v. T. & P. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hicks v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Glasner v. WeisbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API