Legal Opinion

Matlock v. United States

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided February 24, 1970No. Civ. No. 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT M. McRAE, Jr., District Judge.

Petitioner, pro se, pursuant to 28 U. S.C.A. § 2255, alleges that his convictions and sentences under the Federal Bank Robbery Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) (b) and (d), are null and void. He moves that the judgments and sentences be vacated and a new trial be ordered. Petitioner contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by instructing the jury that it could find petitioner guilty of all three counts contained in the indictments. Petitioner further contends that he was put in double jeopardy in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Robert Artemus Burkeen, United States of America v. Harold Tucker MatlockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. James Millard Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. Charles Edward Eakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dickie R. O'Clair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  2. Donald Lee Forrester v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Edmond Willis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Spears v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API