Donald Lee Forrester v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam 1
Donald Lee Forrester, proceeding pro se, filed a motion in the district court to vacate a sentence 1 rendered upon his convictions for violations of the Federal Bank Robbery Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2113. The court below held that he was entitled to no relief. We agree and affirm.
After trial by jury, Forrester was convicted of taking money from a federally insured bank by force and intimidation of one of its employees, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a); assaulting certain bank employees by the use of a dangerous weapon while committing the bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d); and…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Anthony Cardarella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Archie Raymond Streator v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Bobby Joe Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Santos Angel Sosa, Jr., and Rolando Sosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Richard M. Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Eneliko Fatu FaleafineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Bobby Gene Gaddis and Billy Sunday BirtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. PungitoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.