Legal Opinion
Allen v. Purkett
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1993No. 93-2136PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Per curiam
Darrel Allen, Mark Rose, and Michael Radford, inmates at the Farmington Correctional Center (FCC) in Missouri, appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We affirm.
Plaintiffs alleged that defendant Johnie P. Swaringam issued false conduct violation reports for drug use against each of them, and that defendants Arnold S. Dement, Larry Cornell, and Kenneth J. Kluver, members of the conduct hearing review board, refused to provide plaintiffs with copies of the urinalysis results and denied their requests for repeated urinalysis tests conducted by an impartial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Martin v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Bryson Properties, XVIII v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dennis P. Glick v. Willis Sargent, Warden, and Officer Foote, Employee, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. Commonwealth Of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Allen v. PurkettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Thomas v. Fag Bearings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.