Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Earhart v. William Low Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1979No. L.A. 30993Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CLARK, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

Defendant William Low Company owning 17 acres of property acquired a contract right to purchase the adjoining 17 acres (the Pillow property) intending to construct a mobile home park on the 34 acres. A special use permit allowing construction of a mobile home park on the Pillow property was to expire on 29 May 1971. After more than two months of negotiations between plaintiff, a building contractor, and defendant William Low, president of defendant company, agreement was reached for plaintiff to build the park for $892,557.86. On 16 April 1971 counsel for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Palmer v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Rotea v. IzuelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Peerless Glass Co. v. Pacific Crockery & Tinware Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API