Legal Opinion

Butler Bros. v. Diddy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. A. W. 'Wilkinson, Judge. The plaintiffs, four in number, each brought an action to recover certain goods, or their value, by virtue of certain chattel mortgages. The causes were, by agreement, consolidated for trial, and judgment entered for the plaintiffs, from which the defendant.appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

The facts and conclusions upon which the district court based its judgment appear in an opinion, or what in the record is designated a “finding of facts,” as follows:

“Finding by the court: These plaintiffs each bring separate suits against the defendant, each claiming the goods in controversy under and by virtue of certain mortgages executed to them by one Alexander Boyle, the owner of said goods, and claiming they were in possession of said stock of goods under their several mortgages prior to and at the time said goods were taken by the defendant, and they now claim to be entitled to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burrows v. LehndorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Lampson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Kohn Bros. v. Clement, Morton & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Southern White-Lead Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Gage & Co. v. ParrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eicher v. BairdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API