Legal Opinion

Hazelwood v. Olinger Building Department Stores, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The first proposition presented here is that the plaintiff, as receiver of an insolvent corporation, *88has no legal capacity to sue because, the state insolvency laws having been superseded by the federal Bankruptcy Act, the receiver took no title. This assignment of error more properly relates to the second ground of demurrer, viz. that the facts alleged do not constitute a cause of action. Plaintiff has capacity to sue if he has title to the property in question. The appealing defendants predicate their position upon International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, 278 U. S. 261, 49 Sup. Ct. 108. This case…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. International Shoe Co. v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Mayer v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Boese v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Scharine v. HuebschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gelatt v. DeDakisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Fondtosa Highlands, Inc. v. Paramount Development Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Schwemer v. Citizen's Loan & Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Wisconsin Builders Supply Co. v. PrenticeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API