Legal Opinion

Free v. McEver

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1949No. 32375PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is contended by counsel for the employer and the insurance carrier that the employee is a farm laborer, and that therefore thé Workmen’s Compensation Law does not apply to him, as provided in Code § 114-107. In determining this question the words of the statute must be construed reasonably and liberally with the view of applying the beneficent provisions of the statute so as to effectuate its purposes, and to extend them to every class of workman and employee that can fairly be brought within the provisions of the law. See Lee v. Claxton, 70 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Thornton v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Lee v. ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Hardware Mutual Insurance v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Wilson v. SKW Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
  3. Crouse v. Lloyd's Turkey RanchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Bob White Packing Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  5. Blair v. Georgia Baptist Children's Home & Family Ministries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API