Legal Opinion

LaMure v. Peters

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1996No. 17166PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1.This appeal requires us to determine when a cause of action for accountant malpractice accrues, i.e., when taxpayers know or should know of the malpractice of their professional accountants. We must also consider whether various exceptions to the general statute-of-limitations rules, specifically the “altered reasonable person standard,” the “continuous harm doctrine,” or the “continuous representation doctrine,” should be applied in accountant malpractice cases in New Mexico generally or in this case in particular.

2. Plaintiffs, Margaret and David LaMure (the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. John Kohl & Co. PC v. Dearborn & EwingTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXVI Limited Partnership v. Bluff City Community Development CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  3. New Mexico Public Schools Insurance Authority v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Clark v. Deloitte & Touche LLPUtah Supreme Court · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API