Legal Opinion

City of Fargo v. Malme

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2007No. 20070043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mitch Malme and Mitch Malme Investments, L.L.C., appeal from a judgment affirming the Fargo Administrative Enforcement Board’s imposition of a fine for violation of municipal ordinances relating to use of property. Because the administrative enforcement board is not a tribunal authorized by state law, we reverse the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] In 2005, the Fargo Board of City Commissioners adopted Article 1-04 of the Fargo Municipal Code which created an “Administrative Enforcement Program.” The administrative enforcement program is intended to be “an alternative method that may…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. First American Bank & Trust Company v. EllweinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Bismarck v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ebach v. RalstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Minot v. RudolphNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Fargo v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. City of Fargo v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Klug v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API